Skip to main content

Which is pretty sad, too, because chicks are more than just their ass sometimes.

I've seen the Gautier chick-torso perfume bottle before, and now there is the Kardashian chick-torso perfume bottle, and I notice that they always take the picture of the bottles from a front angle. Like, they don't want you to get a good look at the bottle's ass, I guess. Which doesn't make much sense to me because the ass is a pretty good part of a lot of chicks.

And Kim Kardashian is pretty much known for her ass. I mean, what does she show in her pictures on Instagram and shit? Her ass. What position was she in for most of her sex tape? Face Down Ass Up. So you would think the bottle would be, like, a celebration of her ass, but maybe that's why I don't work in advertising, I think almost all packaging would work better if it reminded you of a hot chick's ass.

And maybe the chicks who buy perfume don't want Kim's ass, like, in their face and shit. Because maybe it makes them all self-conscious of their own ass, which may be flat or pimply or saggy and shit, and now they won't buy the perfume because they don't like being reminded of their own sad ass. Which is pretty sad, too, because chicks are more than just their ass sometimes.

I mean, I don't expect her perfume bottle to be herself spreading her ass cheeks and showing her asshole, but, like, maybe she could've gone half-way. Except if she was spreading her ass cheeks and showing her asshole she would need hands, and then it's not just a torso anymore, and that probably fucks up the artistic statement of a chick having no legs or arms or a head or shit.

But I bet if you were to sell, like, an action figure of Kim Kardashian you better be able to make it spread its ass cheeks and show its asshole, because otherwise what's the point? I mean, in that case it's just another chick-doll that pretends that chick-dolls aren't about sex. Before you get all offended and shit, I'm talking about adult chick-dolls here: baby-girl dolls are for little girls to pretend to be a mommy and shit, which doesn't have anything to do with sex.

Comments

  1. KrumhornApril 28, 2018 at 1:03 PM

    Now that you mention it, maybe a good couples marketing thing would be sort of a Kanye torso bottle that would be packaged with its nozzle appendage joined intimately with the perfume bottle in the spread ass cheeks while squirting some man musk and shit when the cap is depressed.

    And for extra fun, maybe when the two packaged bottles are separated at home, the perfume bottle can howl sharply in pain like what happens during cat sex in the alley behind the garage at 2 am. Batteries not included.

    - Krumhorn

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

I mean, straight men in their seventies don’t dress like a pirate unless they are actually a pirate, okay?

I always thought the song was, like, Mick’s way of letting Keith know gently that, no, Mick was not going to fuck him and shit. Because if you can’t tell that Keith Richards is gay then you just don’t know how to look. I mean, straight men in their seventies don’t dress like a pirate unless they are actually a pirate, okay? So when Mick sings “I saw her today at the reception A glass of wine in her hand I knew she was gonna meet her connection” The ‘her’ is Keith, and Keith and Mick are at, like, some party or shit, and Keith’s looking for his drug dealer, because he’s not going to get to fuck Mick and now he needs some more drugs. Pretty obvious. Then Mick sings “But I went down to the demonstration To get your fair share of abuse Singing, "We're gonna vent our frustration If we don't we're gonna blow a fifty-amp fuse" And the ‘demonstration’ is a metaphor for the recording studio, where Keith is abusive of Mick because Mick isn’t rock-and-roll e...
1 comment
Read more

I mean, most of the time the cattle prods are like a metaphor and shit, but sometimes you need a real cattle prod to make your shit obvious.

"our favorite characters are unrelentingly tortured — electrocuted with cattle prods, kicked, threatened with dogs, chained to a gas stove and burned, left alive on a gallows covered with urine." This does kinda sound like harsh shit, but it's, like, a corollary of Internet Rule 34: if it's on video and involves a chick, some dude somewhere will masturbate to it. It's just how media works, if it can't get chicks outraged and dudes masturbating then it isn't doing the job. But "The Handmaid’s Tale" is, like, for chicks to masturbate their feminist clit. Because a lot of chicks feel the most represented in art when they are a victim, like, getting electrocuted with cattle prods. I mean, most of the time the cattle prods are like a metaphor and shit, but sometimes you need a real cattle prod to make your shit obvious. It's kinda like how chicks get Oscars for portraying hookers: because all chicks are hookers and being electrocuted by catt...
1 comment
Read more

Because if you look at rock stars from back in the day, they all pretty much look like twinks, too.

So, like, I did a little research, because some of the gay dudes I know say all twinks are bottoms. And the first Google article has some twinks who say, no, that's a misconception and shit. But then Queerty actually did a survey of gay dudes, and they said, yeah, most twinks are bottoms. But I don't think all twinks are gay and shit. Because if you look at rock stars from back in the day, they all pretty much look like twinks, too. I mean, Mick Jagger: when he was young, he was pretty much a twink, and he wasn't, like, gay ALL the time. And David Bowie was a twink, and HE wasn't gay all the time. There is even that rumor that Jagger and Bowie fucked each other once, but I don't remember if it was ever said who was the bottom. I bet it was Bowie, but that's just a guess, really, maybe he and Jagger both took turns being bottoms and shit. Now, Freddie Mercury: he was pretty much gay all the time, but I don't think he was a twink, I don't think most ...
Post a Comment
Read more