Skip to main content

Some of the evidence gets me thinking maybe she might really be a dude, but then in some of the evidence I think she's hot, so it's conflicting.

I've read a bit about Nasim Aghdam today, because it's never too early to see where the conspiracy theories are going. And there's all the shit about Muslims you would expect, which means there's shit about the Jews, too, which you'd also suspect. But it doesn't seem like people have their hearts in those; maybe they're too generic and shit now, like if you made a conspiracy out of connecting conspiracy words on little refrigerator magnets.

So I'm on 4chan, and of course there are Muslim and Jew conspiracies there, but there's another conspiracy theory that's trending real hard, and that is that Nasim Aghdam was a dude who became a chick.

There's a lot of analyzing of photos, comparing hip-to-shoulders proportions, finger lengths, and chick dance moves versus dude dance moves, and she does kinda dance like a dude, but maybe all Iranian chicks dance like dudes, which wouldn't prove that all Iranian women are transsexual, right?

Some of the evidence gets me thinking maybe she might really be a dude, but then in some of the evidence I think she's hot, so it's conflicting. And no nude photos have shown up yet that seem legit, just her face superimposed on naked chicks spreading their ass cheeks and showing their assholes, like normal.

But what if she WAS a dude who became a chick? Would that prove that women are capable of mass-murder shootings too, or would her shooting spree indicate that she was still a dude inside after all, because it's dudes who do the mass-shooting shit?

Which would then mean the whole transsexual-identity thing is bullshit, because even though she called herself a chick she still tried to shoot people like a dude, so she really didn't become a woman just by saying she was a woman, because women don't shoot shit up. But maybe it's just American women who don't shoot shit up, and Iranian chicks do; I don't know, I'm asking.

And if she was a chick who was originally a dude, would the media report that, or would they try to hide it so people don't hate on the dude-chicks? It seems like it would be hard to keep this hidden, but then the media does do shit like that, and if you think she's a chick who was a dude they'll just act like you're some crazy conspiracy asshole, rather than that they are lying piles of loose shit in a McDonald's toilet.

But I keep looking at her pictures, and sometimes I think she's a dude and sometimes I think she's hot. And she does kinda dance like a dude. But then maybe she is part of a conspiracy to make men question their sexual orientation, like MSNBC using Rachel Maddow. I bet Rachel Maddow dances like a dude, too.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

I mean, straight men in their seventies don’t dress like a pirate unless they are actually a pirate, okay?

I always thought the song was, like, Mick’s way of letting Keith know gently that, no, Mick was not going to fuck him and shit. Because if you can’t tell that Keith Richards is gay then you just don’t know how to look. I mean, straight men in their seventies don’t dress like a pirate unless they are actually a pirate, okay? So when Mick sings “I saw her today at the reception A glass of wine in her hand I knew she was gonna meet her connection” The ‘her’ is Keith, and Keith and Mick are at, like, some party or shit, and Keith’s looking for his drug dealer, because he’s not going to get to fuck Mick and now he needs some more drugs. Pretty obvious. Then Mick sings “But I went down to the demonstration To get your fair share of abuse Singing, "We're gonna vent our frustration If we don't we're gonna blow a fifty-amp fuse" And the ‘demonstration’ is a metaphor for the recording studio, where Keith is abusive of Mick because Mick isn’t rock-and-roll e...

I mean, most of the time the cattle prods are like a metaphor and shit, but sometimes you need a real cattle prod to make your shit obvious.

"our favorite characters are unrelentingly tortured — electrocuted with cattle prods, kicked, threatened with dogs, chained to a gas stove and burned, left alive on a gallows covered with urine." This does kinda sound like harsh shit, but it's, like, a corollary of Internet Rule 34: if it's on video and involves a chick, some dude somewhere will masturbate to it. It's just how media works, if it can't get chicks outraged and dudes masturbating then it isn't doing the job. But "The Handmaid’s Tale" is, like, for chicks to masturbate their feminist clit. Because a lot of chicks feel the most represented in art when they are a victim, like, getting electrocuted with cattle prods. I mean, most of the time the cattle prods are like a metaphor and shit, but sometimes you need a real cattle prod to make your shit obvious. It's kinda like how chicks get Oscars for portraying hookers: because all chicks are hookers and being electrocuted by catt...

"You no hero, GI, you my Jane Fonda! You my Jane Fonda bitch!"

"Has anyone ever asked McCain if, like, when he was a prisoner of war, did any Viet Cong dude ever fuck him in the ass?" I bet, if it happened, it went something like this: "How you like war now, GI? How you like your war now, Big American Soldier Man?" "Stop fucking me in the ass, Viet Cong Prison Guard dude!" "I fuck you in the ass, GI! You bomb my people, and now I fuck you in the ass with the fury of a thousand napalm!" "I'm a soldier! You fucking me in the ass is, like, against the Geneva Convention and shit." "There is no protection for the Imperialist Mangy Dogs! I fuck you in the ass like mangy dog, Imperialist GI!" "Please stop fucking me in the ass, Viet Cong Prison Guard dude!" "You will not defeat the glorious revolution of the peoples! The revolution will not stop until all the Imperialist Mangy Dogs are fucked in the ass!" "It hurts! Even though your cock is small co...