Skip to main content

Maybe it used to be sports, but chicks now want to go watch the game with you too, even though they don't really understand it, they just think they look cute in the team jersey with tight leggings.

I'm going to try to make a point here. I know it won't be as good as some of the people here making their points, because a lot of the people here are really smart, but I think a lot of the people here don't really watch porn, either, so there's that.

Anyway: I think feminism and porn are pretty intertwined -- almost scissoring, maybe.

You look at old 40's and 50's porn, and it's pretty tame: there didn't seem to be a lot of double anal and shit like that. And I think that's because women weren't feminist then, so men still felt protective and chivalrous and shit, they treated the women with respect, even when they were banging them on film.

But as feminism gets more aggressive then porn gets more aggressive, too. Because men kinda have to shut themselves down a bit, they have to be careful what they say and do when women are around or, like, the woman in HR can ruin their life. Or they write a story about how they got naked at your place and sucked your cock, but they felt uncomfortable about doing that, so you're an asshole.

And porn is the last thing where women still cater to what men want. The things men want have been socially marginalized, and you get criticized just for being a white dude who does coding, because you are not a Latina chick who does coding. So they try to get more Latina chicks to do coding and shit, but there's never really that many Latina chicks who actually like to do coding, so when there is one the dude gets pushed aside, even though he lives and breathes that shit.

So as feminism makes a dude's life smaller, he usually has only one area that he can go where it is about what he wants, and that's porn. Maybe it used to be sports, but chicks now want to go watch the game with you too, even though they don't really understand it, they just think they look cute in the team jersey with tight leggings. Which they do, sometimes, because a chick in a football jersey and tight leggings can be pretty hot.

And I don't think many men have a problem with feminism when it's just treating them equal and shit. But when you can't be equal too anymore, when you have to tiptoe around the latest new feminist rule -- well, shit gets bottled up. But the bottled-up shit about having to take more aggressive stupid-shit feminism seriously probably makes dudes want more aggressive porn, because now you got repressed anger in the mix, and you don't want your porn romantic and chivalrous, you want chicks gagging on cocks with the make-up running down their face.

At least, that's what I think is happening. But I bet a lot of men, if they were forced to read Maureen Dowd, would probably be more inclined to view a video of double-anal afterward, just to get their head straight. Yes; 'getting their head straight' and porn -- I see what I did there.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

I mean, straight men in their seventies don’t dress like a pirate unless they are actually a pirate, okay?

I always thought the song was, like, Mick’s way of letting Keith know gently that, no, Mick was not going to fuck him and shit. Because if you can’t tell that Keith Richards is gay then you just don’t know how to look. I mean, straight men in their seventies don’t dress like a pirate unless they are actually a pirate, okay? So when Mick sings “I saw her today at the reception A glass of wine in her hand I knew she was gonna meet her connection” The ‘her’ is Keith, and Keith and Mick are at, like, some party or shit, and Keith’s looking for his drug dealer, because he’s not going to get to fuck Mick and now he needs some more drugs. Pretty obvious. Then Mick sings “But I went down to the demonstration To get your fair share of abuse Singing, "We're gonna vent our frustration If we don't we're gonna blow a fifty-amp fuse" And the ‘demonstration’ is a metaphor for the recording studio, where Keith is abusive of Mick because Mick isn’t rock-and-roll e...
1 comment
Read more

I mean, most of the time the cattle prods are like a metaphor and shit, but sometimes you need a real cattle prod to make your shit obvious.

"our favorite characters are unrelentingly tortured — electrocuted with cattle prods, kicked, threatened with dogs, chained to a gas stove and burned, left alive on a gallows covered with urine." This does kinda sound like harsh shit, but it's, like, a corollary of Internet Rule 34: if it's on video and involves a chick, some dude somewhere will masturbate to it. It's just how media works, if it can't get chicks outraged and dudes masturbating then it isn't doing the job. But "The Handmaid’s Tale" is, like, for chicks to masturbate their feminist clit. Because a lot of chicks feel the most represented in art when they are a victim, like, getting electrocuted with cattle prods. I mean, most of the time the cattle prods are like a metaphor and shit, but sometimes you need a real cattle prod to make your shit obvious. It's kinda like how chicks get Oscars for portraying hookers: because all chicks are hookers and being electrocuted by catt...
1 comment
Read more

Because if you look at rock stars from back in the day, they all pretty much look like twinks, too.

So, like, I did a little research, because some of the gay dudes I know say all twinks are bottoms. And the first Google article has some twinks who say, no, that's a misconception and shit. But then Queerty actually did a survey of gay dudes, and they said, yeah, most twinks are bottoms. But I don't think all twinks are gay and shit. Because if you look at rock stars from back in the day, they all pretty much look like twinks, too. I mean, Mick Jagger: when he was young, he was pretty much a twink, and he wasn't, like, gay ALL the time. And David Bowie was a twink, and HE wasn't gay all the time. There is even that rumor that Jagger and Bowie fucked each other once, but I don't remember if it was ever said who was the bottom. I bet it was Bowie, but that's just a guess, really, maybe he and Jagger both took turns being bottoms and shit. Now, Freddie Mercury: he was pretty much gay all the time, but I don't think he was a twink, I don't think most ...
Post a Comment
Read more