Skip to main content

Maybe he couldn't draw tits well, I don't know, but I think he was just trying to be classy and shit.

I guess I get it, not every chick can have eyebrows like Nasim Najafi Aghdam, but the microbladed chicks always look funny to me, because you can't tell what facial expression they really have, sometimes it seems the eyebrows are doing one thing and the rest of their face is doing another.

I remember my grandfather used to have these framed posters in his condo by some 80s dude named Nagel, and this Nagel dude drew these 80s chicks who always had these, like, 80s eyebrows, and that's what I think of when I see these chicks with the eyebrow tattoos, I think of those framed posters in my grandfather's condo.

The pictures seemed really sexy back then, even though you didn't see, like, tits or anything. Maybe he couldn't draw tits well, I don't know, but I think he was just trying to be classy and shit. But the chicks definitely look 80s. The chicks in 80s copies of Playboy looked 80s, too, but it was a different kind of 80s look, they had, like, bigger hair, and didn't look like Zoolander as much.

There's a guy on 4chan who scans pages from old 80s porn magazines like Swank and High Society and shit. And even in the 80s some of these chicks were spreading their ass cheeks and showing their assholes, but I think it was only models in magazines, regular chicks didn't do this shit yet, it was before the internet.

Anyway, these chicks tattooing their eyebrows, I wonder if in the future they'll look like 80s chicks look to us now. Because it'll be weird, seeing grandmas going around with tattooed eyebrows, pretending like they never posted pictures of themselves spreading their ass cheeks and showing their assholes on the internet.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

I mean, straight men in their seventies don’t dress like a pirate unless they are actually a pirate, okay?

I always thought the song was, like, Mick’s way of letting Keith know gently that, no, Mick was not going to fuck him and shit. Because if you can’t tell that Keith Richards is gay then you just don’t know how to look. I mean, straight men in their seventies don’t dress like a pirate unless they are actually a pirate, okay? So when Mick sings “I saw her today at the reception A glass of wine in her hand I knew she was gonna meet her connection” The ‘her’ is Keith, and Keith and Mick are at, like, some party or shit, and Keith’s looking for his drug dealer, because he’s not going to get to fuck Mick and now he needs some more drugs. Pretty obvious. Then Mick sings “But I went down to the demonstration To get your fair share of abuse Singing, "We're gonna vent our frustration If we don't we're gonna blow a fifty-amp fuse" And the ‘demonstration’ is a metaphor for the recording studio, where Keith is abusive of Mick because Mick isn’t rock-and-roll e...
1 comment
Read more

I mean, most of the time the cattle prods are like a metaphor and shit, but sometimes you need a real cattle prod to make your shit obvious.

"our favorite characters are unrelentingly tortured — electrocuted with cattle prods, kicked, threatened with dogs, chained to a gas stove and burned, left alive on a gallows covered with urine." This does kinda sound like harsh shit, but it's, like, a corollary of Internet Rule 34: if it's on video and involves a chick, some dude somewhere will masturbate to it. It's just how media works, if it can't get chicks outraged and dudes masturbating then it isn't doing the job. But "The Handmaid’s Tale" is, like, for chicks to masturbate their feminist clit. Because a lot of chicks feel the most represented in art when they are a victim, like, getting electrocuted with cattle prods. I mean, most of the time the cattle prods are like a metaphor and shit, but sometimes you need a real cattle prod to make your shit obvious. It's kinda like how chicks get Oscars for portraying hookers: because all chicks are hookers and being electrocuted by catt...
1 comment
Read more

Because if you look at rock stars from back in the day, they all pretty much look like twinks, too.

So, like, I did a little research, because some of the gay dudes I know say all twinks are bottoms. And the first Google article has some twinks who say, no, that's a misconception and shit. But then Queerty actually did a survey of gay dudes, and they said, yeah, most twinks are bottoms. But I don't think all twinks are gay and shit. Because if you look at rock stars from back in the day, they all pretty much look like twinks, too. I mean, Mick Jagger: when he was young, he was pretty much a twink, and he wasn't, like, gay ALL the time. And David Bowie was a twink, and HE wasn't gay all the time. There is even that rumor that Jagger and Bowie fucked each other once, but I don't remember if it was ever said who was the bottom. I bet it was Bowie, but that's just a guess, really, maybe he and Jagger both took turns being bottoms and shit. Now, Freddie Mercury: he was pretty much gay all the time, but I don't think he was a twink, I don't think most ...
Post a Comment
Read more