Skip to main content

It's like when they put accents and umlauts and hats and shit on top of letters -- they're not even that letter anymore, they're a letter with a fucking hat.

The quote says "there are, in fact, almost two trillion ways to lace a shoe with six pairs of eyelets," which sounds pretty wrong to me, but I guess if you have a long enough shoelace maybe the math adds up. Because if the shoelace is endless then you get into all that infinity shit where math doesn't even have to add up right.

I mean, they say Pi doesn't have an end decimal, it just keeps going and going. But if a number doesn't end then how can it really be a number? Because, like, the number 'two' is the answer to 'one plus one', but what two numbers even add up to Pi? See what I mean?

It's bullshit calling it a number. It's like when they put accents and umlauts and hats and shit on top of letters -- they're not even that letter anymore, they're a letter with a fucking hat. So maybe Pi is just a number three with, like, an accent or umlaut or hat or shit, that would at least make more sense.

I have a hard time trying to understand infinity shit, because if something doesn't have a beginning or an end then we should have all kinds of infinity shit just lying around everywhere, because it's always been there and it will never go away, right? I mean, we should practically be tripping all over that shit.

But, like, even rocks erode. But then even that gets weird, because if all rocks erode, then all rocks are only getting smaller, so where do big rocks come from now? I mean, eventually we'd be all out of big rocks, but there still are plenty around.

And that would mean in ancient times the rocks were a lot larger. Which makes a lot of things make more sense, really. Like, when David killed Goliath with a rock, that rock was probably a lot bigger than the rocks we have now, so it makes sense that it would kill a giant. In the future when all rocks are a lot smaller that shit gets more difficult.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

I mean, straight men in their seventies don’t dress like a pirate unless they are actually a pirate, okay?

I always thought the song was, like, Mick’s way of letting Keith know gently that, no, Mick was not going to fuck him and shit. Because if you can’t tell that Keith Richards is gay then you just don’t know how to look. I mean, straight men in their seventies don’t dress like a pirate unless they are actually a pirate, okay? So when Mick sings “I saw her today at the reception A glass of wine in her hand I knew she was gonna meet her connection” The ‘her’ is Keith, and Keith and Mick are at, like, some party or shit, and Keith’s looking for his drug dealer, because he’s not going to get to fuck Mick and now he needs some more drugs. Pretty obvious. Then Mick sings “But I went down to the demonstration To get your fair share of abuse Singing, "We're gonna vent our frustration If we don't we're gonna blow a fifty-amp fuse" And the ‘demonstration’ is a metaphor for the recording studio, where Keith is abusive of Mick because Mick isn’t rock-and-roll e...
1 comment
Read more

I mean, most of the time the cattle prods are like a metaphor and shit, but sometimes you need a real cattle prod to make your shit obvious.

"our favorite characters are unrelentingly tortured — electrocuted with cattle prods, kicked, threatened with dogs, chained to a gas stove and burned, left alive on a gallows covered with urine." This does kinda sound like harsh shit, but it's, like, a corollary of Internet Rule 34: if it's on video and involves a chick, some dude somewhere will masturbate to it. It's just how media works, if it can't get chicks outraged and dudes masturbating then it isn't doing the job. But "The Handmaid’s Tale" is, like, for chicks to masturbate their feminist clit. Because a lot of chicks feel the most represented in art when they are a victim, like, getting electrocuted with cattle prods. I mean, most of the time the cattle prods are like a metaphor and shit, but sometimes you need a real cattle prod to make your shit obvious. It's kinda like how chicks get Oscars for portraying hookers: because all chicks are hookers and being electrocuted by catt...
1 comment
Read more

Because if you look at rock stars from back in the day, they all pretty much look like twinks, too.

So, like, I did a little research, because some of the gay dudes I know say all twinks are bottoms. And the first Google article has some twinks who say, no, that's a misconception and shit. But then Queerty actually did a survey of gay dudes, and they said, yeah, most twinks are bottoms. But I don't think all twinks are gay and shit. Because if you look at rock stars from back in the day, they all pretty much look like twinks, too. I mean, Mick Jagger: when he was young, he was pretty much a twink, and he wasn't, like, gay ALL the time. And David Bowie was a twink, and HE wasn't gay all the time. There is even that rumor that Jagger and Bowie fucked each other once, but I don't remember if it was ever said who was the bottom. I bet it was Bowie, but that's just a guess, really, maybe he and Jagger both took turns being bottoms and shit. Now, Freddie Mercury: he was pretty much gay all the time, but I don't think he was a twink, I don't think most ...
Post a Comment
Read more