Skip to main content

It's just bad karaoke by a guy who probably thinks he's being clever, but he's really just being a douche, because don't fuck with the song that way, asshole.

If 4chan were to have a 4chan anthem, then that 4chan anthem would probably be 'Creep'. Which is pretty obvious, I know. But here's the thing: the cool people can't take that song from us. The pretty people can't take that song from us. If you sing that song you better be, if not a creep, than at least a weirdo, okay?

I mean, look at the singer from Radiohead. He's scrawny, with a wonky eye. He's famous now, and people consider him cool, but deep down, he's still one of us. A pudgy drag guy singing the song? Sure, that works, even when he isn't in drag. But I think if he sang it in drag then people would be all over his shit, because it would make it seem like he was calling people in drag creeps. So he kinda had to do it without being dressed in drag, because even when you're a weirdo people will jump your shit for not being a weirdo the right way.

Even Prince works, because he was a weird little dude, but he doesn't sing it as 'I', he keeps using 'you', because I think he's trying to make it spiritual or something. But it still works because Prince was always a weird little dude, so he can get away with it.

But, say, Justin Timberlake singing 'Creep'? Sorry, dude, it won't work. I mean, you seem like you're gay and still fucking Jessica Biel, but that doesn't make you a weirdo, you're just a rich good-looking guy who can't figure out his rich good-looking guy shit, don't go fucking with our song.

Or what about Steven Tyler. He's old and creepy, and he still likes the young chicks, but that's not the right kind of creepy, because old creepy rock stars who like the young chicks are just sad, not weirdos. And Steven Tyler is pretty fucking sad.

So I'm reading this Althouse post, and I start thinking, did Bob Dylan ever cover the song 'Creep'? I look it up, but there's only a guy doing 'Creep' in a bad fake Bob Dylan voice. Which isn't even funny, it's just bad karaoke by a guy who probably thinks he's being clever, but he's really just being a douche, because don't fuck with the song that way, asshole.

But I bet Bob Dylan could do a version that would be okay, because he really is kind of a weirdo. When I was in school you could get your ass kicked for listening to Bob Dylan, because that meant you were some kind of hippie fag. And that's close enough.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

I mean, straight men in their seventies don’t dress like a pirate unless they are actually a pirate, okay?

I always thought the song was, like, Mick’s way of letting Keith know gently that, no, Mick was not going to fuck him and shit. Because if you can’t tell that Keith Richards is gay then you just don’t know how to look. I mean, straight men in their seventies don’t dress like a pirate unless they are actually a pirate, okay? So when Mick sings “I saw her today at the reception A glass of wine in her hand I knew she was gonna meet her connection” The ‘her’ is Keith, and Keith and Mick are at, like, some party or shit, and Keith’s looking for his drug dealer, because he’s not going to get to fuck Mick and now he needs some more drugs. Pretty obvious. Then Mick sings “But I went down to the demonstration To get your fair share of abuse Singing, "We're gonna vent our frustration If we don't we're gonna blow a fifty-amp fuse" And the ‘demonstration’ is a metaphor for the recording studio, where Keith is abusive of Mick because Mick isn’t rock-and-roll e...

I mean, most of the time the cattle prods are like a metaphor and shit, but sometimes you need a real cattle prod to make your shit obvious.

"our favorite characters are unrelentingly tortured — electrocuted with cattle prods, kicked, threatened with dogs, chained to a gas stove and burned, left alive on a gallows covered with urine." This does kinda sound like harsh shit, but it's, like, a corollary of Internet Rule 34: if it's on video and involves a chick, some dude somewhere will masturbate to it. It's just how media works, if it can't get chicks outraged and dudes masturbating then it isn't doing the job. But "The Handmaid’s Tale" is, like, for chicks to masturbate their feminist clit. Because a lot of chicks feel the most represented in art when they are a victim, like, getting electrocuted with cattle prods. I mean, most of the time the cattle prods are like a metaphor and shit, but sometimes you need a real cattle prod to make your shit obvious. It's kinda like how chicks get Oscars for portraying hookers: because all chicks are hookers and being electrocuted by catt...

Because if you look at rock stars from back in the day, they all pretty much look like twinks, too.

So, like, I did a little research, because some of the gay dudes I know say all twinks are bottoms. And the first Google article has some twinks who say, no, that's a misconception and shit. But then Queerty actually did a survey of gay dudes, and they said, yeah, most twinks are bottoms. But I don't think all twinks are gay and shit. Because if you look at rock stars from back in the day, they all pretty much look like twinks, too. I mean, Mick Jagger: when he was young, he was pretty much a twink, and he wasn't, like, gay ALL the time. And David Bowie was a twink, and HE wasn't gay all the time. There is even that rumor that Jagger and Bowie fucked each other once, but I don't remember if it was ever said who was the bottom. I bet it was Bowie, but that's just a guess, really, maybe he and Jagger both took turns being bottoms and shit. Now, Freddie Mercury: he was pretty much gay all the time, but I don't think he was a twink, I don't think most ...