Skip to main content

I'm just saying you maybe need to see if you can be the one to break the cycle, okay?

"By the way, the Trump family attorneys have stated in writing that Barron Trump is not autistic. And I know nothing more than that. Only what Harder wrote."

Wow, dude. You thought this was worth writing, so you wrote it, and then you hit Publish so other people could see what you wrote.

And you drag a dude's kid into snarky passive-aggressive innuendo bullshit, and no doubt if you are called on it you'll just say some shit like "I'm only saying what the dude's lawyer said."

Fuck, dude: were you, like, molested as a kid? Because your anger seems like the kind that comes from shame and doubt. And by feeling only anger you're not allowing yourself to be afraid or lonely or shit, which isn't healthy. It probably even causes cancer testicles, I bet.

So now you figure small boys are fair game for shit, because no one was there to protect you when you needed it, and you resent those who get to grow up free of that pain: I get it.

But dude: you are not responsible for the abuse you experienced. And being fucked in the ass as a child doesn't make you less of a man, it doesn't make you weak, or, like, a chick.

And you're probably afraid that you will experience more shame if you were to actually talk about it, which is fucked up, you should be able to say what happened to you, like, in the bowling alley bathroom or whatever, I don't know your details.

I'm just saying you maybe need to see if you can be the one to break the cycle, okay? Because you're not a child being fucked in the ass by an old dude anymore, you're an adult who's being fucked in the ass by pain.

So I'm sorry if you were abused and shit as a child, because that sucks. But if you really weren't fucked in the ass as a kid then you really have no good reason to be such a fucking asshole.

Comments

  1. I like how you always try to see the best in people.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I try, I try real hard. Because even most of the people who suck don't, like, suck all the time.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

I mean, straight men in their seventies don’t dress like a pirate unless they are actually a pirate, okay?

I always thought the song was, like, Mick’s way of letting Keith know gently that, no, Mick was not going to fuck him and shit. Because if you can’t tell that Keith Richards is gay then you just don’t know how to look. I mean, straight men in their seventies don’t dress like a pirate unless they are actually a pirate, okay? So when Mick sings “I saw her today at the reception A glass of wine in her hand I knew she was gonna meet her connection” The ‘her’ is Keith, and Keith and Mick are at, like, some party or shit, and Keith’s looking for his drug dealer, because he’s not going to get to fuck Mick and now he needs some more drugs. Pretty obvious. Then Mick sings “But I went down to the demonstration To get your fair share of abuse Singing, "We're gonna vent our frustration If we don't we're gonna blow a fifty-amp fuse" And the ‘demonstration’ is a metaphor for the recording studio, where Keith is abusive of Mick because Mick isn’t rock-and-roll e...

I mean, most of the time the cattle prods are like a metaphor and shit, but sometimes you need a real cattle prod to make your shit obvious.

"our favorite characters are unrelentingly tortured — electrocuted with cattle prods, kicked, threatened with dogs, chained to a gas stove and burned, left alive on a gallows covered with urine." This does kinda sound like harsh shit, but it's, like, a corollary of Internet Rule 34: if it's on video and involves a chick, some dude somewhere will masturbate to it. It's just how media works, if it can't get chicks outraged and dudes masturbating then it isn't doing the job. But "The Handmaid’s Tale" is, like, for chicks to masturbate their feminist clit. Because a lot of chicks feel the most represented in art when they are a victim, like, getting electrocuted with cattle prods. I mean, most of the time the cattle prods are like a metaphor and shit, but sometimes you need a real cattle prod to make your shit obvious. It's kinda like how chicks get Oscars for portraying hookers: because all chicks are hookers and being electrocuted by catt...

Because if you look at rock stars from back in the day, they all pretty much look like twinks, too.

So, like, I did a little research, because some of the gay dudes I know say all twinks are bottoms. And the first Google article has some twinks who say, no, that's a misconception and shit. But then Queerty actually did a survey of gay dudes, and they said, yeah, most twinks are bottoms. But I don't think all twinks are gay and shit. Because if you look at rock stars from back in the day, they all pretty much look like twinks, too. I mean, Mick Jagger: when he was young, he was pretty much a twink, and he wasn't, like, gay ALL the time. And David Bowie was a twink, and HE wasn't gay all the time. There is even that rumor that Jagger and Bowie fucked each other once, but I don't remember if it was ever said who was the bottom. I bet it was Bowie, but that's just a guess, really, maybe he and Jagger both took turns being bottoms and shit. Now, Freddie Mercury: he was pretty much gay all the time, but I don't think he was a twink, I don't think most ...