Skip to main content

I realize there wasn't an Internet when the Soviet Union was around, but I bet their internet would've sucked back then.

I'm checking out 4chan like I normally do, seeing what crazy shit people are up to. And people are doing crazy shit, which is kinda reassuring actually: if people all of a sudden stopped posting crazy shit it would probably mean something real bad was coming up.

Because people use the internet to vent and let out their demons in a way that would get them arrested if they did that shit for real. I don't mean the pictures of chicks spreading their ass cheeks and showing their assholes, I don't think you can get arrested for that shit anymore, I mean the crazy angry shit. Maybe the chicks spreading their ass cheeks and showing their assholes are, like, angry at their parents or boyfriends or something, but that's different.

Then I click on some Althouse posts because it can't be 4chan all the time, that's not healthy I think, but then some of the commenters seem angry, too. And I think these Althouse people are a lot more mature than most of the people on 4chan, because most of the people who comment on Althouse seem old, but when people get angry it all kinda runs together.

I'm not saying these people on Althouse should be looking at pictures of chicks spreading their ass cheeks and showing their assholes, but maybe it would help them put things in perspective. Because I bet in the Soviet Union you couldn't show pictures of chicks spreading their ass cheeks and showing their assholes, you'd probably be sent to Siberia or some shit like that.

I realize there wasn't an Internet when the Soviet Union was around, but I bet their internet would've sucked back then. Everything you did would have people watching. I mean, I guess it would kinda be like Facebook is now, but it would've probably been worse, I'm just not sure how exactly.

But I bet in the Soviet Union they would've crushed an Althouse and a 4chan. So I think we still are okay, mostly. But if they start trying to crush an Althouse or a 4chan then maybe the crazy shit coming is really coming now.

Like maybe Google or Amazon would start warning Althouse that her shit's too real, and they might start making threats. Which would suck, because I like Amazon, you can get shit pretty cheap sometimes and you don't even have to leave the house or anything. But sometimes those with a lot of power start thinking they need to use that power, when they should just fucking shut up and let things ride.

Sometimes I think Althouse should just post a picture of some chicks spreading their ass cheeks and showing their assholes, just to show she could. But maybe I think that because I spend too much time on 4chan. But I guess I might as well check out 4chan while I can, in case the crazy shit starts coming soon.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

I mean, straight men in their seventies don’t dress like a pirate unless they are actually a pirate, okay?

I always thought the song was, like, Mick’s way of letting Keith know gently that, no, Mick was not going to fuck him and shit. Because if you can’t tell that Keith Richards is gay then you just don’t know how to look. I mean, straight men in their seventies don’t dress like a pirate unless they are actually a pirate, okay? So when Mick sings “I saw her today at the reception A glass of wine in her hand I knew she was gonna meet her connection” The ‘her’ is Keith, and Keith and Mick are at, like, some party or shit, and Keith’s looking for his drug dealer, because he’s not going to get to fuck Mick and now he needs some more drugs. Pretty obvious. Then Mick sings “But I went down to the demonstration To get your fair share of abuse Singing, "We're gonna vent our frustration If we don't we're gonna blow a fifty-amp fuse" And the ‘demonstration’ is a metaphor for the recording studio, where Keith is abusive of Mick because Mick isn’t rock-and-roll e...

I mean, most of the time the cattle prods are like a metaphor and shit, but sometimes you need a real cattle prod to make your shit obvious.

"our favorite characters are unrelentingly tortured — electrocuted with cattle prods, kicked, threatened with dogs, chained to a gas stove and burned, left alive on a gallows covered with urine." This does kinda sound like harsh shit, but it's, like, a corollary of Internet Rule 34: if it's on video and involves a chick, some dude somewhere will masturbate to it. It's just how media works, if it can't get chicks outraged and dudes masturbating then it isn't doing the job. But "The Handmaid’s Tale" is, like, for chicks to masturbate their feminist clit. Because a lot of chicks feel the most represented in art when they are a victim, like, getting electrocuted with cattle prods. I mean, most of the time the cattle prods are like a metaphor and shit, but sometimes you need a real cattle prod to make your shit obvious. It's kinda like how chicks get Oscars for portraying hookers: because all chicks are hookers and being electrocuted by catt...

Because if you look at rock stars from back in the day, they all pretty much look like twinks, too.

So, like, I did a little research, because some of the gay dudes I know say all twinks are bottoms. And the first Google article has some twinks who say, no, that's a misconception and shit. But then Queerty actually did a survey of gay dudes, and they said, yeah, most twinks are bottoms. But I don't think all twinks are gay and shit. Because if you look at rock stars from back in the day, they all pretty much look like twinks, too. I mean, Mick Jagger: when he was young, he was pretty much a twink, and he wasn't, like, gay ALL the time. And David Bowie was a twink, and HE wasn't gay all the time. There is even that rumor that Jagger and Bowie fucked each other once, but I don't remember if it was ever said who was the bottom. I bet it was Bowie, but that's just a guess, really, maybe he and Jagger both took turns being bottoms and shit. Now, Freddie Mercury: he was pretty much gay all the time, but I don't think he was a twink, I don't think most ...