Skip to main content

But I think chicks don't want to be treated like children. I mean, they say that and shit, but now I kinda wonder if I really should believe them.

I saw this Tom Brokaw molester shit yesterday, so I was figuring Althouse would do a big post on it, like take him apart line by line and trace the history of words and shit. I don't know, maybe she will do that later, it might be, like, lunch-time in Wisconsin. Because I don't even know what time zone Wisconsin is in, I only know the east coast is, like, three hours ahead of Washington, and then there's that daylight-savings time and shit, and Wisconsin is somewhere in the middle.

Anyway, I wrote my first thoughts on the Brokaw molester shit here: Anyway, I think Tom Brokaw's that kind of guy -- like, not a child molester, but that he treats chicks like a child molester treats children before he fucks them after they look at the secret magazines with their pants off.

But now I see that a bunch of big-time journalist chicks have written a letter, like, supporting him and shit, and that gets me confused. Because I thought a dude treating chicks like a child molester treats children was now a bad thing. But then it turns out that sometimes it is, and sometimes it isn't. And as far as I can figure, only big-time journalists see the difference.

But if chicks want dudes to be consistent in not tickling them when they don't want to be tickled and shit, then they kinda need to be consistent in how they respond to it. Because this shit makes me think sometimes it's okay, but then if I tickle a hot chick at the bus stop I'll be the one who is fucked, just because I'm not Tom Brokaw, and that sucks.

I mean, is tickling a chick sometimes just tickling, or is it always, like, finger-rape? Because I understand if you tickle a chick's tits or, like, vagina, that they can then be pissed at you if you didn't ask them if it was okay to tickle their tits or vagina, I get that. And I realize that you can grab their pussy when you're a star and they just let you do it.

But there's a lot of shit in the middle, and chicks just keep making it more confusing. I mean, most all of us think molesting children is bad, so maybe we need to treat women like children so everyone's cool. But I think chicks don't want to be treated like children. I mean, they say that and shit, but now I kinda wonder if I really should believe them.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

I mean, straight men in their seventies don’t dress like a pirate unless they are actually a pirate, okay?

I always thought the song was, like, Mick’s way of letting Keith know gently that, no, Mick was not going to fuck him and shit. Because if you can’t tell that Keith Richards is gay then you just don’t know how to look. I mean, straight men in their seventies don’t dress like a pirate unless they are actually a pirate, okay? So when Mick sings “I saw her today at the reception A glass of wine in her hand I knew she was gonna meet her connection” The ‘her’ is Keith, and Keith and Mick are at, like, some party or shit, and Keith’s looking for his drug dealer, because he’s not going to get to fuck Mick and now he needs some more drugs. Pretty obvious. Then Mick sings “But I went down to the demonstration To get your fair share of abuse Singing, "We're gonna vent our frustration If we don't we're gonna blow a fifty-amp fuse" And the ‘demonstration’ is a metaphor for the recording studio, where Keith is abusive of Mick because Mick isn’t rock-and-roll e...
1 comment
Read more

I mean, most of the time the cattle prods are like a metaphor and shit, but sometimes you need a real cattle prod to make your shit obvious.

"our favorite characters are unrelentingly tortured — electrocuted with cattle prods, kicked, threatened with dogs, chained to a gas stove and burned, left alive on a gallows covered with urine." This does kinda sound like harsh shit, but it's, like, a corollary of Internet Rule 34: if it's on video and involves a chick, some dude somewhere will masturbate to it. It's just how media works, if it can't get chicks outraged and dudes masturbating then it isn't doing the job. But "The Handmaid’s Tale" is, like, for chicks to masturbate their feminist clit. Because a lot of chicks feel the most represented in art when they are a victim, like, getting electrocuted with cattle prods. I mean, most of the time the cattle prods are like a metaphor and shit, but sometimes you need a real cattle prod to make your shit obvious. It's kinda like how chicks get Oscars for portraying hookers: because all chicks are hookers and being electrocuted by catt...
1 comment
Read more

Because if you look at rock stars from back in the day, they all pretty much look like twinks, too.

So, like, I did a little research, because some of the gay dudes I know say all twinks are bottoms. And the first Google article has some twinks who say, no, that's a misconception and shit. But then Queerty actually did a survey of gay dudes, and they said, yeah, most twinks are bottoms. But I don't think all twinks are gay and shit. Because if you look at rock stars from back in the day, they all pretty much look like twinks, too. I mean, Mick Jagger: when he was young, he was pretty much a twink, and he wasn't, like, gay ALL the time. And David Bowie was a twink, and HE wasn't gay all the time. There is even that rumor that Jagger and Bowie fucked each other once, but I don't remember if it was ever said who was the bottom. I bet it was Bowie, but that's just a guess, really, maybe he and Jagger both took turns being bottoms and shit. Now, Freddie Mercury: he was pretty much gay all the time, but I don't think he was a twink, I don't think most ...
Post a Comment
Read more