Skip to main content

Before, a chick going out in the snow to the well to pump water was a helpful thing, but now it just comes out of a faucet, no big deal.

A little earlier I said:

"So I think the concept of mutually satisfactory hetero sex is feminist myth shit, pretty much. I mean, men and women and sex: the parts fit together right, but the thoughts sure don't."

and

"So hetero sex isn't about satisfaction, it's about making babies. Really, I think the only way you can get to mutually satisfactory sex is when it is two dudes."

And since then it looks like this post has come down to which sex can say what to the other, and everything is spinsters and small penises.

Which kinda makes my point, I think. If it wasn't for evolution giving us those biological urges to find the other sex attractive for fucking purposes then men and women would probably never give much of a shit about the other.

We've spent thousands of years trying to sand down the edges, but, deep down, we'd probably be like the male cat that fucks the female cat for one hot screeching minute then leaves, never to be seen again, if it wasn't that it usually took two people to get shit done in the old days. You know, back when there was women's work in the house, before you got dishwasher and laundry robots and microwaves that could cook dinner.

But now that two people aren't necessary anymore, one person can go it alone, thanks to technology, government programs and not having to worry about rustlers and savage Indians storming your prairie house and shit. Before, a chick going out in the snow to the well to pump water was a helpful thing, but now it just comes out of a faucet, no big deal.

And, after the dishwasher and laundry robots and microwaves, come the sex robots, so I don't see the need for the other getting any stronger in the future.

Women are losing their kindness, men are losing their manliness, and government is making it possible for them to do this because now they don't have a need to do the difficult shit of building bonds and trust, the government will be Big Daddy. So the need to find common ground is less important, and pretty soon you're on the internet talking about spinsters and small penises.

Sometimes I think the only time that men and women can truly get along is after the menopause and low testosterone hit. Then men and women can get together like those old WW2 Japanese and American soldiers that hated the fuck out of each other during the war, but now get together and salute each other in the spirit of common honor and courage.

But when they were younger: Pearl Harbor and Hiroshima, baby.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

I mean, straight men in their seventies don’t dress like a pirate unless they are actually a pirate, okay?

I always thought the song was, like, Mick’s way of letting Keith know gently that, no, Mick was not going to fuck him and shit. Because if you can’t tell that Keith Richards is gay then you just don’t know how to look. I mean, straight men in their seventies don’t dress like a pirate unless they are actually a pirate, okay? So when Mick sings “I saw her today at the reception A glass of wine in her hand I knew she was gonna meet her connection” The ‘her’ is Keith, and Keith and Mick are at, like, some party or shit, and Keith’s looking for his drug dealer, because he’s not going to get to fuck Mick and now he needs some more drugs. Pretty obvious. Then Mick sings “But I went down to the demonstration To get your fair share of abuse Singing, "We're gonna vent our frustration If we don't we're gonna blow a fifty-amp fuse" And the ‘demonstration’ is a metaphor for the recording studio, where Keith is abusive of Mick because Mick isn’t rock-and-roll e...
1 comment
Read more

I mean, most of the time the cattle prods are like a metaphor and shit, but sometimes you need a real cattle prod to make your shit obvious.

"our favorite characters are unrelentingly tortured — electrocuted with cattle prods, kicked, threatened with dogs, chained to a gas stove and burned, left alive on a gallows covered with urine." This does kinda sound like harsh shit, but it's, like, a corollary of Internet Rule 34: if it's on video and involves a chick, some dude somewhere will masturbate to it. It's just how media works, if it can't get chicks outraged and dudes masturbating then it isn't doing the job. But "The Handmaid’s Tale" is, like, for chicks to masturbate their feminist clit. Because a lot of chicks feel the most represented in art when they are a victim, like, getting electrocuted with cattle prods. I mean, most of the time the cattle prods are like a metaphor and shit, but sometimes you need a real cattle prod to make your shit obvious. It's kinda like how chicks get Oscars for portraying hookers: because all chicks are hookers and being electrocuted by catt...
1 comment
Read more

Because if you look at rock stars from back in the day, they all pretty much look like twinks, too.

So, like, I did a little research, because some of the gay dudes I know say all twinks are bottoms. And the first Google article has some twinks who say, no, that's a misconception and shit. But then Queerty actually did a survey of gay dudes, and they said, yeah, most twinks are bottoms. But I don't think all twinks are gay and shit. Because if you look at rock stars from back in the day, they all pretty much look like twinks, too. I mean, Mick Jagger: when he was young, he was pretty much a twink, and he wasn't, like, gay ALL the time. And David Bowie was a twink, and HE wasn't gay all the time. There is even that rumor that Jagger and Bowie fucked each other once, but I don't remember if it was ever said who was the bottom. I bet it was Bowie, but that's just a guess, really, maybe he and Jagger both took turns being bottoms and shit. Now, Freddie Mercury: he was pretty much gay all the time, but I don't think he was a twink, I don't think most ...
Post a Comment
Read more