So, like you can't put up a painting of some fat chick from the 1800s now without someone being offended? Because, in most of the famous paintings of nude chicks that I've seen, the chicks just aren't that hot. And if they're not that hot then it must be art, because why else would you paint them?
Maybe the fat chicks were considered hot then, things change, but even their faces aren't real pretty, so, again, I think that means art.
Because if hot naked chicks are art, then 4chan is, like, a museum. And maybe pictures of chicks spreading their ass cheeks and showing their assholes is, like, a statement about some important shit.
I mean, maybe it's a thing about that Male Gaze shit: like, a chick says, "you want to see me naked, then here, look at my asshole." Because in most of those photos you can't even see their tits.
But chicks don't get that naked is naked to a dude. And maybe that guy who splattered paint for his pictures was on to something: not a lot of oppressed people should be offended by that.
But then maybe there are people who are offended by it, because maybe it culturally appropriates some other race that spilled their paint and shit, like maybe spilling paint wasn't originally an American thing. I guess it probably comes down to a lot of people spilled paint, it just matters which dude first called it art.
I think the American artist dude was named Jackson Pollack. I might've spelled the name wrong, I'm not sure if it's spelled like the dudes from Poland or the frozen fish.
Maybe the fat chicks were considered hot then, things change, but even their faces aren't real pretty, so, again, I think that means art.
Because if hot naked chicks are art, then 4chan is, like, a museum. And maybe pictures of chicks spreading their ass cheeks and showing their assholes is, like, a statement about some important shit.
I mean, maybe it's a thing about that Male Gaze shit: like, a chick says, "you want to see me naked, then here, look at my asshole." Because in most of those photos you can't even see their tits.
But chicks don't get that naked is naked to a dude. And maybe that guy who splattered paint for his pictures was on to something: not a lot of oppressed people should be offended by that.
But then maybe there are people who are offended by it, because maybe it culturally appropriates some other race that spilled their paint and shit, like maybe spilling paint wasn't originally an American thing. I guess it probably comes down to a lot of people spilled paint, it just matters which dude first called it art.
I think the American artist dude was named Jackson Pollack. I might've spelled the name wrong, I'm not sure if it's spelled like the dudes from Poland or the frozen fish.
Comments
Post a Comment