Skip to main content

And maybe they're not going to roll a tank over your house and set your shit on fire, but it seems like they kinda want you to know that they can, if they feel like it.

I know a lot of people that get stoned, it's not hard to say that in Seattle. Some of these people are cool, some are retarded and shit, but the people I know that don't get stoned are like that too, so I don't really think about it much.

And I once got to fuck a chick because she was pissed off at her deadbeat boyfriend for being stoned so much and not, like, cleaning his dishes and shit, so that kinda worked out for me. And really, I wish I met more chicks who had sex with dudes because they were pissed off at their boyfriends, that would make my life easier I think.

My problem is that, when the government decides that you're doing something bad, they can get all epic on your ass. Like, twenty-five years ago on this day the government decided that some religious nuts were doing something bad, so they ran their house over with tanks and set them on fire and shit.

And, like, I'm still not sure exactly what was so bad that they were doing. Or at least so bad that you think it's a good idea to run over their house with tanks and set them on fire and shit.

But that's the kind of shit government does when it decides it doesn't like what you're doing. Because it used to be that breaking the law is what made the government jump your shit, but now it seems like the law is kinda besides the point -- you can break some laws and be seen as, like, a protester or victim or hero or shit, and other times you're not breaking a law but they still are out for your ass, because they can always find some law that you're breaking, they just need a reason to find it.

So I'm not very confident when the government decides something is bad, because all the good things are considered bad by somebody, the government just hasn't, like, got around to all of it yet. And maybe they're not going to roll a tank over your house and set your shit on fire, but it seems like they kinda want you to know that they can, if they feel like it.

And that's probably why they won't let you have a tank, because if you had a tank maybe you wouldn't put up with that shit.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

I mean, straight men in their seventies don’t dress like a pirate unless they are actually a pirate, okay?

I always thought the song was, like, Mick’s way of letting Keith know gently that, no, Mick was not going to fuck him and shit. Because if you can’t tell that Keith Richards is gay then you just don’t know how to look. I mean, straight men in their seventies don’t dress like a pirate unless they are actually a pirate, okay? So when Mick sings “I saw her today at the reception A glass of wine in her hand I knew she was gonna meet her connection” The ‘her’ is Keith, and Keith and Mick are at, like, some party or shit, and Keith’s looking for his drug dealer, because he’s not going to get to fuck Mick and now he needs some more drugs. Pretty obvious. Then Mick sings “But I went down to the demonstration To get your fair share of abuse Singing, "We're gonna vent our frustration If we don't we're gonna blow a fifty-amp fuse" And the ‘demonstration’ is a metaphor for the recording studio, where Keith is abusive of Mick because Mick isn’t rock-and-roll e...
1 comment
Read more

I mean, most of the time the cattle prods are like a metaphor and shit, but sometimes you need a real cattle prod to make your shit obvious.

"our favorite characters are unrelentingly tortured — electrocuted with cattle prods, kicked, threatened with dogs, chained to a gas stove and burned, left alive on a gallows covered with urine." This does kinda sound like harsh shit, but it's, like, a corollary of Internet Rule 34: if it's on video and involves a chick, some dude somewhere will masturbate to it. It's just how media works, if it can't get chicks outraged and dudes masturbating then it isn't doing the job. But "The Handmaid’s Tale" is, like, for chicks to masturbate their feminist clit. Because a lot of chicks feel the most represented in art when they are a victim, like, getting electrocuted with cattle prods. I mean, most of the time the cattle prods are like a metaphor and shit, but sometimes you need a real cattle prod to make your shit obvious. It's kinda like how chicks get Oscars for portraying hookers: because all chicks are hookers and being electrocuted by catt...
1 comment
Read more

Because if you look at rock stars from back in the day, they all pretty much look like twinks, too.

So, like, I did a little research, because some of the gay dudes I know say all twinks are bottoms. And the first Google article has some twinks who say, no, that's a misconception and shit. But then Queerty actually did a survey of gay dudes, and they said, yeah, most twinks are bottoms. But I don't think all twinks are gay and shit. Because if you look at rock stars from back in the day, they all pretty much look like twinks, too. I mean, Mick Jagger: when he was young, he was pretty much a twink, and he wasn't, like, gay ALL the time. And David Bowie was a twink, and HE wasn't gay all the time. There is even that rumor that Jagger and Bowie fucked each other once, but I don't remember if it was ever said who was the bottom. I bet it was Bowie, but that's just a guess, really, maybe he and Jagger both took turns being bottoms and shit. Now, Freddie Mercury: he was pretty much gay all the time, but I don't think he was a twink, I don't think most ...
Post a Comment
Read more