Skip to main content

And I still don't get why chicks wrestle. Unless they are lesbians.

I was thinking about a teacher maybe doing a little DVDA with some high school students, and it made me think of a story I read a few weeks ago about a high school girl who is becoming a boy. She's taking the steroids and shit, and she does kinda look like a dude.

Anyway, she's on the girl's wrestling team, even though she thinks she's a boy, and she's kicking ass wrestling because the steroids and shit are making her like a boy, even if she's still a girl, and so she's like a boy wrestling girls, so that's why she's kicking ass.

I don't know if Althouse did a post about it, because I think that would be a thing she would do.

And I'm thinking: what if one of the real girl wrestlers got so mad at having to wrestle a boy that she then shot up the school? Because she's been practicing and practicing, and working out hard and shit, to be a real good chick wrestler, but then she has to wrestle a girl who's been taking boy juice and now he's kicking her ass wrestling.

I know that would make me mad. Not mad enough to shoot up a school or nothing, but some people's mad is different than others. But I guess chicks don't shoot up schools, when they get upset they become cutters and shit. But now that chick wrestler who's becoming a dude, is she gonna be more likely to shoot up a school? It's worth thinking about.

And all of this sex change shit makes me wonder if some of the naked girls spreading their ass cheeks on 4chan are really dudes. But I would think you would see their balls, unless they were cut off and shit. Fuck though, it would suck to be rubbing one out over a naked chick spreading her ass cheeks and then finding out she was a dude.

And I still don't get why chicks wrestle. Unless they are lesbians.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

I mean, straight men in their seventies don’t dress like a pirate unless they are actually a pirate, okay?

I always thought the song was, like, Mick’s way of letting Keith know gently that, no, Mick was not going to fuck him and shit. Because if you can’t tell that Keith Richards is gay then you just don’t know how to look. I mean, straight men in their seventies don’t dress like a pirate unless they are actually a pirate, okay? So when Mick sings “I saw her today at the reception A glass of wine in her hand I knew she was gonna meet her connection” The ‘her’ is Keith, and Keith and Mick are at, like, some party or shit, and Keith’s looking for his drug dealer, because he’s not going to get to fuck Mick and now he needs some more drugs. Pretty obvious. Then Mick sings “But I went down to the demonstration To get your fair share of abuse Singing, "We're gonna vent our frustration If we don't we're gonna blow a fifty-amp fuse" And the ‘demonstration’ is a metaphor for the recording studio, where Keith is abusive of Mick because Mick isn’t rock-and-roll e...
1 comment
Read more

I mean, most of the time the cattle prods are like a metaphor and shit, but sometimes you need a real cattle prod to make your shit obvious.

"our favorite characters are unrelentingly tortured — electrocuted with cattle prods, kicked, threatened with dogs, chained to a gas stove and burned, left alive on a gallows covered with urine." This does kinda sound like harsh shit, but it's, like, a corollary of Internet Rule 34: if it's on video and involves a chick, some dude somewhere will masturbate to it. It's just how media works, if it can't get chicks outraged and dudes masturbating then it isn't doing the job. But "The Handmaid’s Tale" is, like, for chicks to masturbate their feminist clit. Because a lot of chicks feel the most represented in art when they are a victim, like, getting electrocuted with cattle prods. I mean, most of the time the cattle prods are like a metaphor and shit, but sometimes you need a real cattle prod to make your shit obvious. It's kinda like how chicks get Oscars for portraying hookers: because all chicks are hookers and being electrocuted by catt...
1 comment
Read more

Because if you look at rock stars from back in the day, they all pretty much look like twinks, too.

So, like, I did a little research, because some of the gay dudes I know say all twinks are bottoms. And the first Google article has some twinks who say, no, that's a misconception and shit. But then Queerty actually did a survey of gay dudes, and they said, yeah, most twinks are bottoms. But I don't think all twinks are gay and shit. Because if you look at rock stars from back in the day, they all pretty much look like twinks, too. I mean, Mick Jagger: when he was young, he was pretty much a twink, and he wasn't, like, gay ALL the time. And David Bowie was a twink, and HE wasn't gay all the time. There is even that rumor that Jagger and Bowie fucked each other once, but I don't remember if it was ever said who was the bottom. I bet it was Bowie, but that's just a guess, really, maybe he and Jagger both took turns being bottoms and shit. Now, Freddie Mercury: he was pretty much gay all the time, but I don't think he was a twink, I don't think most ...
Post a Comment
Read more