Skip to main content

And -- come on -- no one is going to masturbate to that.

If you spend a lot of time on 4chan you can get paranoid. Because you gotta know the Government is watching. I mean, sure, maybe there are some people there who the Government should be watching, maybe. But they don't just watch them, they watch everyone. And that sucks.

And when you realize this, some of the people who post there look pretty suspicious. Because you click on a link, but they put that link there to get you to click on it. And now you're on a list. Click on the picture of Robert Mueller and Stalin done as tentacle porn? You're on a list. Click on that post with the Government dressed as Nazis trying to take guns away from redneck naked chicks, and you're on a list.

And people will say that the Government has to do that, to catch terrorists and pedophiles. But sometimes the picture of David Hogg fucking an anime baby isn't sexual, the cartoon infant represents the Second Amendment. But some people just see a teenage boy fucking a baby and think the worst.

There was a picture a while back of Shia LaBeouf being fucked in the ass by a tranny. Then someone took that picture and Photoshopped Trump's face on the tranny. So now it was a tranny Trump fucking Shia LaBeouf in the ass. And -- come on -- no one is going to masturbate to that. Because it isn't sexual, it's, like, a political cartoon. But if you clicked on that picture, you're on a list.

And then I come to Althouse, and I wonder if the government is watching here, too. Because there are a few commenters who could be government provocateurs, I think. And yes -- I had to Google 'provocateurs' to spell it right.

But maybe I'm being too paranoid. Maybe the government isn't watching Althouse. Maybe it's only Amazon, making sure Althouse doesn't say the wrong thing. But that makes me paranoid, too.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

I mean, straight men in their seventies don’t dress like a pirate unless they are actually a pirate, okay?

I always thought the song was, like, Mick’s way of letting Keith know gently that, no, Mick was not going to fuck him and shit. Because if you can’t tell that Keith Richards is gay then you just don’t know how to look. I mean, straight men in their seventies don’t dress like a pirate unless they are actually a pirate, okay? So when Mick sings “I saw her today at the reception A glass of wine in her hand I knew she was gonna meet her connection” The ‘her’ is Keith, and Keith and Mick are at, like, some party or shit, and Keith’s looking for his drug dealer, because he’s not going to get to fuck Mick and now he needs some more drugs. Pretty obvious. Then Mick sings “But I went down to the demonstration To get your fair share of abuse Singing, "We're gonna vent our frustration If we don't we're gonna blow a fifty-amp fuse" And the ‘demonstration’ is a metaphor for the recording studio, where Keith is abusive of Mick because Mick isn’t rock-and-roll e...
1 comment
Read more

I mean, most of the time the cattle prods are like a metaphor and shit, but sometimes you need a real cattle prod to make your shit obvious.

"our favorite characters are unrelentingly tortured — electrocuted with cattle prods, kicked, threatened with dogs, chained to a gas stove and burned, left alive on a gallows covered with urine." This does kinda sound like harsh shit, but it's, like, a corollary of Internet Rule 34: if it's on video and involves a chick, some dude somewhere will masturbate to it. It's just how media works, if it can't get chicks outraged and dudes masturbating then it isn't doing the job. But "The Handmaid’s Tale" is, like, for chicks to masturbate their feminist clit. Because a lot of chicks feel the most represented in art when they are a victim, like, getting electrocuted with cattle prods. I mean, most of the time the cattle prods are like a metaphor and shit, but sometimes you need a real cattle prod to make your shit obvious. It's kinda like how chicks get Oscars for portraying hookers: because all chicks are hookers and being electrocuted by catt...
1 comment
Read more

Because if you look at rock stars from back in the day, they all pretty much look like twinks, too.

So, like, I did a little research, because some of the gay dudes I know say all twinks are bottoms. And the first Google article has some twinks who say, no, that's a misconception and shit. But then Queerty actually did a survey of gay dudes, and they said, yeah, most twinks are bottoms. But I don't think all twinks are gay and shit. Because if you look at rock stars from back in the day, they all pretty much look like twinks, too. I mean, Mick Jagger: when he was young, he was pretty much a twink, and he wasn't, like, gay ALL the time. And David Bowie was a twink, and HE wasn't gay all the time. There is even that rumor that Jagger and Bowie fucked each other once, but I don't remember if it was ever said who was the bottom. I bet it was Bowie, but that's just a guess, really, maybe he and Jagger both took turns being bottoms and shit. Now, Freddie Mercury: he was pretty much gay all the time, but I don't think he was a twink, I don't think most ...
Post a Comment
Read more